Photographers


15
Mar 2012

Topic of conversation

Why do people shop at dollar stores? Is it for the customer service, the wonderful store ambience or the quality of the products? It’s only because of the prices.

Why do people buy coffee at Starbucks? Is it for the customer service, the wonderful store ambience or the quality of the products? It’s certainly not because of the prices.

Consumers choose to shop at a particular store for a variety of reasons and price is not often the primary motivator. Instead, customers search for the best value for their money. Value is always in the eye of the buyer, not the seller.

If you think your customers shop only by price then you may have no choice but to compete on price. This becomes a downhill race unless you can sell a huge volume of product to compensate for the low prices.

But a professional photographer can’t work by volume since there’s only so many hours in a day. A photography business is not scalable. The photographer has to change their strategy so that price is not the top priority, (unless the photographer is trying to attract only bargain hunters).

If the first page on a photographer’s web site is about price, then that photographer is encouraging customers to shop price. From that moment, it’s a losing proposition.

A photographer must sell something other than price. They have to convince the customer that they are the best solution to the customer’s photo needs.

“Hire us because we have the lowest portrait prices in town” is meaningless and encourages the customer to shop price.

“Hire us because we are experienced portrait photographers and we do good work” won’t win much attention because everyone says that.

Both of those statements are spoken from the photographer’s point of view.

“When you hire us, you’re assured that you’ll look your best in your new business portraits. Your pictures will enhance the credibility of your business.”

When a photographer talks to a customer about what matters most to that customer, price will no longer be the main topic of conversation.

 




9
Mar 2012

Reach for the top

That Sears, Walmart and some grocery stores have portrait studios should be of no concern to commercial photographers. That these stores do family portraits for as little as $7.99 and business portraits for $29.95 is meaningless.

Don’t worry about it.

These cheap photo stores are not your competition, unless you’re trying to do $7.99 children’s portraits and $29.95 business portraits.

Don’t worry that some other professional photographer charges $35/hour or that they give away all pictures and copyrights for $199. Unless you’re racing to run your business into the ground, this photographer is not your competition.

Your competition is the photographer who charges more than you because they have what you want.

Always compete up not down.




28
Feb 2012

Filling in the blanks

A common assignment for corporate photographers, commercial photographers and, of course, architectural photographers is to produce photos of buildings, factories and retail locations.

With exterior photos, a client will sometimes request the digital removal of objects such as hydro poles, road signs, overhead wires, fire hydrants, bus stops, etc.

What’s funny about such requests is the client often assumes that once the object is erased, whatever was behind that object will become visible.

But as every photographer knows, when something is digitally removed from a photo, it just leaves a blank spot in the picture.

Continue reading →




24
Feb 2012

Business advice for photographers

The American Society of Media Photographers (ASMP) has a few dozen videos to help professional photographers improve their business practices. Topics include negotiating, marketing, pricing, paperwork, licensing and copyright.

These videos were produced for American photographers and so there are a few legal and business issues that either don’t apply or are different here in Canada. However, many of the concepts and principles are equally applicable to Canadian photographers.

 




23
Feb 2012

Commercial photography for web sites

When licensing pictures, corporate photographers and commercial photographers must remember that there’s no such thing as “web use”. The Web is a medium, not a use. Photos used online can be editorial, advertising or something in-between.

Many business clients use photographs not only on their own web site but also on social media sites such as Facebook. A photographer has to decide whether such use is no longer editorial or public relations but rather a form of advertising. The common definition that a paid placement is advertising may no longer apply.

For a corporate client, its own web site is usually considered marketing collateral and not advertising. All advertising is marketing, but not all marketing is advertising.

But for a business client such as a retailer, is its web site a form of advertising? What about that company’s presence on social media sites?

Perhaps every use on the Web should be priced higher than similar use in print? This is not just for the higher and longer-lasting “circulation” of a web site but also for the increased shift towards advertising use.




css.php