rant

Taking stock of your photography

2 Comments

Everything old is new again. Maybe it’s because a new audience is always being born or maybe it’s because some folks fail to learn from history.

Around the year 2000, a Canadian web developer started his own online stock picture agency. Back then, existing stock agencies usually screened prospective photographers and they refused his photos as not being good enough.

His new stock agency accepted everyone and initially gave pictures away for free. But he soon realized that free wasn’t sustainable and he began to charge a few dollars per picture. His stock site was aimed at amateur photographers who were happy to give away their pictures:

The monetary rewards are an added bonus, but I don’t think they’re everything for everyone,” he said. “I think our core group of photographers, our 2000 exclusives” — photographers with portfolios exclusive to iStockphoto — are motivated by the reward of being part of an elite club that engages in creative discussion nonstop.

– Bruce Livingstone

Continue reading →

Editorial Sports Photography Is Dead

4 Comments

If you’re thinking of becoming an editorial sports photographer, don’t.

 

 

Or at least first read this 2015 interview with five veteran sports photographers.

This short article describes what has happened over the past dozen years in editorial sports photography.

Basically, the deal is, editorial sports photography is completely dead as a market for a photographer to make even a modest living. Dead. Kaput. Over. Flatlined. The best action photographers in the world, who freelanced or were staffers at the major sports magazines, are all out of work . . .

– Robert Seale, photographer

Continue reading →

Toronto Film Festival 2017 Review

No Comments

My annual, ridiculously long rant about the recent Toronto International Film Festival (TIFF). If you’re not somehow connected to, or involved with, TIFF then it might be better to skip this post. I’m just trying to reach a certain audience. The reason is that each year, TIFF sends out a survey asking for journalists’ thoughts about the film festival but there are no questions for photographers. The film festival seemingly has no regard for photographers because it treats photography as an afterthought.

tl;dr:

1) Someone must have read this blog because this year TIFF finally sent out a directory of publicists. In the past, photographers weren’t allowed to have this list. The directory is important if you have to arrange a photo shoot with a director, actor, producer, etc.

 

2) Someone did not read this blog because TIFF, yet again, failed to email the list of red carpet events even though this information was available almost two weeks prior to the festival. Thank goodness publicists sent out much of this information ahead of time.
Continue reading →

Value Is A Two-way Street

2 Comments

Over the past month, I lost photo jobs to photographers who quoted:

1) $1,200 for a two-day shoot in two cities 100 km apart, including 22 business portraits, 11 environmental portraits, and up to 66 finished images delivered.

2) $1,500 to photograph a four-day business conference.

3) A photographer, self-described on his website as the “best professional headshot photographer in Toronto,” who quoted $3,000 for 120 business headshots. That’s just $25 per headshot.

Whenever a customer declines your quote, ask what the winning photographer charged. Some won’t share that information, but they might if you explain that you’re simply trying to understand where your pricing fits in the market.

Was I disappointed to lose these jobs? Of course.

Was I upset? No.

What I can’t figure out is how these photographers make money.
Continue reading →

Running a photography business

No Comments

Confucius was wrong when he said:

Choose a job you love and you will never have to work a day in your life.

Running a photography business consists of short moments of photography broken up by long periods of business. But those moments of photography make it worthwhile.

While photographers do need to make money, the need to create pictures may be more important. It’s not always about money.

Making money is a job. Making good pictures is an accomplishment.

 

The Photography Gig Economy

No Comments

You may have heard the trendy phrase “gig economy” which, I suppose, is the opposite of a job economy. Of course, if you’re a self-employed photographer, you’re probably laughing at the discovery of this “new” economy. Another laughable trendy phrase is the “sharing economy.”

In the old days, someone could have one job for their entire life but that is disappearing. Today, more and more people are self-employed and they freelance for a number of employers. A short-term job here, a temporary job there.

As every self-employed person will tell you, the problem is that freelancers fall through every crack in every labour law. No minimum wage, no set hours, no legal overtime, no guaranteed meal breaks, no sick pay, no holiday pay, no statutory holidays, no benefits, etc.

Canadian freelancers aren’t covered by any labour law. In fact, Canadian freelancers aren’t even guaranteed that they will get paid for their work.

A few days ago on October 27, 2016, New York City passed what could be a landmark new law in the USA. The so-called “Freelance Isn’t Free Act” will help protect freelancers from late-paying and non-paying customers.

Recognizing the shift toward the gig economy, a British MP yesterday called for a minimum wage for self-employed people. The United Kingdom already has a late payment law which helps freelancers collect on late payments [link to PDF].

The number of self-employed and freelancers is going nowhere but up (and here). And it will get worse.

Canada is doing nothing.

 

css.php