advertising

Business Photography of Yesteryear

No Comments

The need for business photography, commercial photography and advertising photography has existed almost as long as photography itself.

 

An advertisement for the McLaughlin Carriage Company of Oshawa, Ontario, circa 1907. Early advertising used drawings, photo engravings or photo etchings. (Library and Archives Canada)

Early advertising illustrations for newspapers, billboards and posters were created from drawings, photo engravings or photo etchings. The first use of halftones to reproduce a continuous tone photograph was in 1869 in Canada but it took several decades before it became common practice.

Continue reading →

Driving Emotions

No Comments

How often do you see a photo credit on a company’s press release pictures? Have you ever seen a credit line on a product photo?

For example, when you see a photo of a new car, supplied by the car manufacturer, there’s either no credit line or it simply names the car manufacturer that supplied the photo.

A few weeks ago, Ford Motor Company launched its advertising campaign for the 2017 Lincoln Continental. Newspapers like The Globe and Mail did their usual car review and included handout photos of the new car. But this time, the handout photos had a credit line. The November 10th print version of The Globe and Mail used:

(Photo – Annie Leibovitz / Ford)

Continue reading →

Product Photography Standards

No Comments

Many commercial photographers do product photography and it’s usually done on a white background. This style of product photography is very common. Web sites, catalogs, newspaper ads, brochures and billboards all frequently use “product-on-white”.

A white background is popular because: it reproduces easily and consistently in any medium; it doesn’t distract from the product nor cause any colour cast; it won’t go out of style; it’s easy to drop out or overlay with text; it’s easy to merge multiple product photos together. White is simply the most versatile product background.

Crazily enough, in 2014, Amazon was granted a US patent for product-on-white photography. This caused quite an uproar. Tens of thousands of photographers petitioned the US Patent Office to cancel the patent. But photographers can still shoot products on a white background. Amazon’s patented technique is somewhat specific in nature and it’s also unenforceable.
Continue reading →

Pricing photography for social media

No Comments

In the old days, photographers priced their photography based on its type of usage. Generally speaking, editorial has the lowest price, public relations and corporate have a mid-range price and advertising has the highest price.

This worked quite well for 45 years or so. Then someone invented Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, etc.

With social media, the line between editorial, corporate and advertising can be nearly invisible. When a company publishes pictures on Facebook et al., is that editorial, public relations or advertising?

Every type of business communication is a form of marketing. At the very least, social media should be considered public relations rather than pure editorial even though it may use an editorial style of photography.
Continue reading →

Advertising or Public Relations

No Comments

What’s the difference between advertising and public relations?

The short answer is:

Advertising is bought from a media outlet’s sales department.

Public relations is received free from a media outlet’s news department.

Guess which one has more credibility?
Continue reading →

Importance of marketing collateral

No Comments

The key to enhancing business image and winning consumer trust is through the use of marketing collateral.

Marketing collateral refers to the various forms of communication a business publishes on its own. By contrast, paid placements, such as advertising, are not a form of marketing collateral. Advertising is part of the sales process whereas marketing collateral supports the sales process. To a small extent, marketing collateral might be considered “advertorial” content produced by the company.

Advertising often fails because consumers simply don’t trust ads. Advertising claims are not always backed up by any information. Customers are very skeptical because they know that advertising is only concerned with taking their money.
Continue reading →

Misleading Intentions

No Comments

A new online stock agency (of sorts), called ImageBrief, recently launched in Australia. What’s different about this stock photo agency is that a photo buyer first posts a description of the picture(s) they’re seeking along with the price they’re willing to pay. Interested photographers can then post any of their stock pictures which meet the buyer’s description. The photo buyer chooses the “winning” picture(s) and pays the photographer. The stock agency gets a commission.

Okay, so far so good.

But look at some of the photo buyers:

• A coffee shop/bakery was looking for a picture to market its store. Rather than hiring a photographer to produce authentic photography of the store’s own products, the shop bought a stock photo which featured another company’s coffee and someone else’s baked goods.

Would you consider this to be misleading advertising by the coffee shop?

Continue reading →

css.php